April 9th: Now that we have arrived the work begins. We spent the day checking out the snow, putting our ground-based LiDAR together and testing it, and dealing with some lingering logistical problems (like making sure ten barrels of aviation fuel arrive before the plane does).

Figure 1: A snow pit near the headwaters of Imnavait Creek. The researcher is whisking the pit face to accentuate the layers (P. Martin photo).
To help interpret the snow pit, we use a variety of tricks to delineate and accentuate the layers. For example, using brushes, we whisk the pit face (Fig. 1). This sweeps away material from the weaker layers, making the harder wind slabs stand out in bolder relief. Another way is to back cut the pit, allowing sunlight to shine through the snow, essentially the same effect as if we were looking at a section of the snow on a light table (Fig. 2). Both the brushing and the light tend to highlight the grain differences between layers, and these differences arise from differences in snow metamorphism. Surprisingly little of the layer texture is due to the nature of the initial snowfall. A third, newer method to expose the layers, is to photograph the pit face using a near-infrared camera, which is very sensitive to variations in light reflection due to grain size differences. Unfortunately, this method requires post-processing, so it does not have the immediacy of the other methods.

Figure 2: The backside (sunny side) of the snow pit has been cut away to allow light to pass through the snow layers.
There are dozens of types of snow layers in nature (not to be confused with snowflakes, of which there are many as well): new snow layers, recent snow layers, fine-grained layers, melt clusters, ice layers, grauple. And there is hoar: surface hoar and depth hoar. It turns out these latter are both very common in the Arctic, and in a moment I will explain why, but first a disclaimer: this type of hoar is quite different from the other type, more commonly found in gangster movies etc. The
word “hoar” is related to the word “hoary” meaning gray, old, and venerable. Apparently, the similarity between frost feathers and an old man’s beard led to the use of the word in snow science. Frost feathers are ornate, though usually flat or fern-like, frost crystals that condense on surfaces during cold still periods (Fig. 3). Surface hoar is similar to frost feathers, but it forms on the surface of snow pack on cold, clear nights. Depth hoar is equally ornate, but is more three-dimensional (Fig. 4), and it forms throughout the winter at the bottom of the snow pack (hence the “depth” part).
Figure 4: Depth hoar from the base of the snow pack (J. Holmgren photo). The sharp edge in the foreground was facing downward during growth.
The reason why the Arctic snow pack has such a high percentage of depth hoar and frequent surface hoar formation is simply because it is cold. It will come as no surprise that this is a cold place in winter, and even when spring is arriving (as it is now), it can still be extremely cold at night. Cold air creates temperature gradients. The snow surface will be perhaps -30°C, while the base of the snow will be -10°C. Heat moves from warm to cold, and moisture follows the same gradient, so moisture in the form of water molecules are constantly moving upward from the relatively warm ground surface below the snow through the porous snow pack, condensing on the lower sides of crystals, causing them to grow (and have razor-sharp edges), and sublimating from the tops of the grains, making the tops rounded. In the case of the surface hoar, on a cold, clear night the snow surface cools by long wave radiation, and soon is the coldest surface around. Any moisture migrating upward from below, or downward from above, condenses out as surface hoar. All three types of crystals are ornate, with sharp edges and well-defined facets because they grow in very moist environments. The supply of moisture for growth is not the limiting factor: instead the crystal kinetics control the growth (a good topic for another blog. The end result is beautiful crystals in all there cases.
These are the hoars….surface hoar, depth hoar, hoar frost. While they can be found in many snowy locations, they can be found in their prime in the Arctic.

Figure 5: A field of barchans (horn-shaped snow dunes) march down a hill into a creek in Western Alaska.
(Click on image below for animation)

Figure 6: Time lapse of a barchan moving past our webcam. Note the horns pointing downwind (A. Gelvin images).

Figure 8: The end result of the snow pit with lots of depth hoar and a thick, hard wind slab right in the middle.
We are not the only ones in the Arctic thinking about wind slabs. Large animals like this muskox (Fig. 9) and caribou have to work down through these hard slabs to get at their food. A hard wind slab can make that effort too taxing, so they are excellent at finding where the slabs are thin or non-existent…..better even than Arctic snow scientists at doing so. But more on this process (called cratering) tomorrow.


























